With the transfer of Leroy Sané to Bayern Munich now confirmed, Barcelona seem to have missed out on yet another young player who could have greatly improved the team. When comparing the German’s stats to Barça’s left winger this season, Antoine Griezmann, it’s clear that Sané would have been a brilliant signing.
On Thursday, Bundesliga champions Bayern Munich made official the signing of Manchester City’s Leroy Sané for 49 million euros plus 11 million in variables. It is true that the 24-year-old German left winger had missed most of the season in England due to an anterior cruciate ligament tear. But, for his price and Barcelona’s problems out wide, the Catalans should have set their sights on Sané.
Antoine Griezmann was purchased by Barça last summer, but, with Luis Suárez and Lionel Messi often having a reserved spot in the starting line-up, the former Atlético de Madrid man has been forced to act as a left winger on multiple occasions. Nevertheless, that’s not Griezmann’s best position, but it is Sané’s.
While this article will be comparing Sané to Griezmann, this is not an attempt to ridicule the Frenchman. It has been clear to all Barça fans that Griezmann has been well out of his preferred position and role this campaign. However, he has played most of his minutes on the left of the front three, which was the preferred role for Leroy Sané at Manchester City.
Thus, comparing the numbers of the two players allows one to see the different strengths that make Sané more suited to that role. This doesn’t mean the Griezmann should be out of the team. If anything, Leroy’s signing would have allowed Antoine to move to a better position, while providing more balance in the side.
The heatmap of Leroy Sané in the 2018/19 Premier League season (left) vs Antoine Griezmann in the 2019/20 La Liga season (right). Both players operating primarily down the left | Heatmap by SofaScore
Due to Leroy Sané’s knee injury this past August, he has only played twelve minutes of Premier League football this season. Because of this, his stats from the 2018/19 Premier League campaign will be used, and compared to Griezmann’s from this season. So, what do the numbers say?
Goal scoring and finishing
The finishing aspect of the game is the one where most would expect Griezmann to outperform Sané. The Frenchman has a far greater reputation as a striker and goal scorer due to his time playing up top for Atlético de Madrid. But, the stats show that Sané has just as much, if not more goal scoring ability from the wing.
First things first, the charts in this article for Sané show his stats in comparison to all outfield players who played at least half the available minutes in that Premier League season. While Griezmann’s show his stats in comparison to all La Liga outfielders who have played at least half their team’s minutes so far this season. By splitting up their two respective leagues, this takes away much of the differences in stats produced by different styles of play between the two countries.
The charts also utilize the fifth percentile for each stat as the minimum, and the ninety-fifth percentile as the maximum. This is done to remove outliers that would skew the data. Think about how comparing some of Lionel Messi’s stats to other players, even if they are very good, will always make them look poor in comparison.
Stats are correct as of July 4, 2020 | Stats from Football Reference
At a glance, it’s clear that both players perform very well in this part of the game relative to their leagues. Going further into the numbers, though, can reveal some interesting facts.
In terms of getting into better scoring positions, Griezmann’s stats are the slightly better of the two. He beats Sané, barely, in non-penalty expected goals per 90 minutes. This means that from the shots taken by the two players, Antoine is expected to score slightly more goals. Griezmann also has a higher non-penalty expected goals per shot, meaning that the average shot he takes is a better chance, and is more likely to go in.
Unfortunately for the 29-year-old, he has not done as much with these chances as Sané did in 2018/19. Despite being expected to score less, Sané’s actual goals per 90 minutes and goals per shot are higher. In fact, Sané’s 0.48 non-penalty goals per 90 were the eighth best in the Premier League that season. Griezmann, despite having more history as a striker, is currently seventeenth in La Liga.
Sané also has the advantage in terms of his shots on target. With 1.16 per 90, he has a significantly higher volume of shooting, but his rate of getting them on target is still just 0.2% below Griezmann’s.
With these stats in mind, it’s clear that Sané takes better advantage of his shots, even if Griezmann’s tend to come from better positions. This is a crucial trait to have at a side like Barça, where many teams will try to defend with a low block and everybody behind the ball. Leroy Sané clearly has the ability to make something out of nothing in these situations, which would have provided Barcelona with a much-needed attacking spark alongside Lionel Messi.
Chance creation has been one of the most criticized aspects of Grizmann’s performance this season. He often seems too pragmatic with the ball, and compared to the likes of Messi and Suárez he very seldom makes that final pass or creative play. While the Frenchman’s stats aren’t bad at all, Leroy Sané’s completely blow him away.
A clean sweep for Sané, as he betters Griezmann in every stat, and by a comfortable margin. It’s clear to see that the German is the more adept of the two at providing for teammates.
For expected assists per 90 minutes, Sané’s tally is more than double that of Griezmann. It was also good enough to be the third highest in the Premier League that season – Griezmann is currently forty-third in La Liga.
In terms of key passes – passes leading directly to a shot –, passes into the penalty area, and through balls, Sané’s numbers are at least 50% better than Griezmann’s for each stat. This trend continues for their shot and goal-creating actions, which are the two offensive actions – pass, dribble, etc. – leading to a shot or goal. Sané’s 0.77 goal-creating actions per 90 minutes were third in the league, while Griezmann is currently thirty-third.
Ultimately, these numbers reflect what has been clear for all Barcelona supporters to see: Griezmann lacks the dynamism and creative ability to play out wide. A player with the profile of Sané can be far more involved in the attack, and uses his skill set as a natural winger to open the game up for his teammates.
It’s surprising that Griezmann’s dribbling does not get talked about more often. Maybe it’s because he doesn’t even attempt it enough for people to notice it as a weakness, or maybe it has just been ignored. Either way, the Frenchman’s stats for carrying the ball and beating defenders have been atrocious this season, and they reflect another key characteristic that a Barça winger has to have.
Right off the bat, Sané completes an astonishing five times more dribbles per 90 minutes than Griezmann. For more perspective, that 2.9 dribbles per 90 was the fourth highest in the Premier League that season. Meanwhile Griezmann’s 0.57 dribbles have him one-hundred fourteenth in La Liga. One-hundred fourteenth!
Even more impressive is the fact that Sané’s dribble success rate is significantly higher, so he dribbles with greater volume and efficiency. This shows a real lack of ability to take defenders on for Griezmann, and an abundance of that ability for Sané.
Also important is the progressive distance of the two players’ carries, or the total distance they dribble the ball towards the opposition goal. Lionel Messi currently leads La Liga in this stat, but with him aging, it’s vital for Barça to get a pair of fresh legs in the attack who can help share the burden of advancing the ball. Sané, who progresses the ball 2.86 times further per 90 minutes than Griezmann, could have been this player.
Griezmann does draw 0.04 more fouls per 90 minutes, and gets dispossessed far less. Nonethless, that isn’t much of a positive when you factor in how little he does on the ball compared to Sané. The value gained by beating a defender in the attacking third can be far greater than the value lost by getting dispossessed. Ultimately, risks have to be taken to create goals, results, and even entertainment.
These dribbling metrics point out another vital flaw that prevents Griezmann from fitting in as a winger. As previously mentioned, Barça forwards need to be able to produce something against a deep-lying defense. But when Antoine plays out wide at Barcelona, he lacks the ability on the ball to break down a defence, an ability which Leroy Sané definitely has.
While it is most of the time the least important aspect of the game for a Barça forward, and the least entertaining, defending is still a job that must be done. Especially with Messi conserving his energy more and more for the attack, he needs players around him who put in a lot of effort. Defensive effort is the one area in which nobody can fault Griezmann this season, but Sané can do this job as well.
Note: For these charts, the defensive stats of the two players are shown only in comparison to the other players in their league with forward listed as their primary position by Football Reference
While Griezmann’s ball-winning stats – tackles and interceptions – stand out more in relation to the league, Sané’s aren’t too far behind. In fact, the German had the highest combined tackles and interceptions per 90 minutes out of Manchester City’s primary forwards that season: Sergio Agüero, Gabriel Jesus, Raheem Sterling and Leroy Sané himself. So while there were other Premier League forwards winning the ball more than Sané, he has definitely shown that he can handle being the most defensively active player in a front three.
Additionally, the area of defending in which Leroy Sané seems to excel the most is the most important area for Barcelona forwards: pressing. A successful pressure is given when the player’s team wins possession of the ball within five seconds of that player applying pressure on the ball carrier. Antoine Griezmann is currently sixth out of La Liga forwards for successful pressures per 90 minutes, and first for Barcelona forwards. Sané was eighth in the league and first for Manchester City.
Both Sané and Griezmann also press with very high efficiency. Sané’s success rate of 33.50% was the best in the whole Premier League for forwards, and a whole 4.2% higher than second best Sadio Mané, from Liverpool. Showing more similarity between their defensive output, Griezmann is currently second out of La Liga forwards for this metric.
While Sané has some very good defensive numbers, it’s undeniable that Griezmann appears the stronger player here. Especially when looking at the Frenchman’s numbers relative to other La Liga forwards, his defensive output is truly elite. Rather, these numbers serve to show that Leroy Sané is comfortable and willing to do defensive work. He’s a great presser, and took on a lot of defensive responsibility in Manchester City’s attack, so these numbers are more to refute the claim that Leroy Sané wouldn’t fit Barcelona due to his work rate.
With all of this in mind, it’s clear for anyone to see that Leroy Sané ticked all the boxes required to be a great Barcelona winger. Even without looking at any statistics, it’s obvious that he would have added width, pace, and far more dynamism in attack than is currently supplied on the left by Griezmann. The numbers just back this up, and make it even more frustrating as to how the Barça board didn’t make more of a push for the German.
The main benefits of signing Sané would have clearly been a vast improvement in terms of creative play and dribbling. On top of this, he still gives his side brilliant finishing and goal scoring output, as well as the pressing intensity and defensive responsibility that Griezmann has. The transfer of Leroy Sané to Barcelona seems like it should have been a no-brainer, but that isn’t really how the board operate.
Especially when you take into account that Sané is still only twenty-four years old – five years younger than Griezmann – and ended up costing Bayern a bargain price of just around €50 million, it seems this was just too smart of a deal for Bartomeu and co. to make. Instead, that money is being invested into aging players who don’t fill any necessary roles. Compared to a club like Bayern who have made their transfers with supreme intelligence and negotiating to replace their older generation, Barcelona are miles behind.
Koeman’s system in the Barcelona 4-0 Villareal
With a 4-0 victory at the Camp Nou, Koeman’s side has started the season on a positive note. Find out more about the tactical aspect of the match in this tactical analysis of Barcelona’s match against Villareal.
La Liga is finally back, and it’s back in full swing. We saw many high-scoring matches, with even Atleti scoring 6 goals against Granada. A very entertaining start to La Liga was capped off by Barcelona’s 4-0 Victory over Villareal. Koeman’s first La Liga game in-charge of Barcelona was a resounding success. The mindset of the players involved was clearly different from the mindset under Setien. With many players looking rejuvenated, Barcelona put in a performance which was desperately needed considering the fact that the wounds from Lisbon haven’t yet healed. Find out just how Barcelona managed to dominate a strong Villareal side in this tactical analysis.
Barcelona started out in a 4-2-3-1 as expected. The only surprise was that Messi’s starting position was more central than usual and Griezmann occupied the right-wing. Messi does eventually drift towards the centre anyway but the starting position is usually wider.
Villareal were in a 4-4-2 which later transitioned into a 4-4-2 diamond in the second half after the substitutions. Right from the start, Villareal looked to press from the front, with Chukwueze and Moi Gomez cutting out passing lanes to the full-backs and the two Villareal strikers pressing Barcelona’s center-backs. Here, an advantage of the 4-2-3-1 Koeman deployed was immediately visible. De Jong would drop back to receive the ball and then play it forward to Busquets, who was the other pivot. Had Barcelona played a 4-3-3, the pivot would have dropped back to receive the ball and build-up from the back in this case. But the midfield would be stretched vertically which we saw many times last season.
In midfield, Barcelona were prevented from playing through the centre by Parejo and Coquelin. The distance between Villareal’s midfield and defense lines was not much which forced Barcelona towards the wings. This strategy came back to bite Villareal in the form of Ansu Fati. The 17-year-old left-winger was unplayable against Villareal. Gaspar was unable to contain him. Jordi Alba was much better than in a long time. The work-rate Koeman demands and the many extra training sessions were really showing. After a 2019/20 season which wasn’t the best for Barcelona, yesterday’s performance was very impressive.
Both wingers would regularly tuck-in between the full-backs and center-halves. This allowed Barcelona’s full-backs to advance up the field much more. With the full-backs attacking and the wingers tucking in, the Villareal defensive line would be occupied. This allowed Coutinho more space than usual. Along with this, Busquets and De Jong would be available to either stop the counter, or to act as passing options. This assortment of many attacking roles allowed Barcelona to have sustained attacking possession.
Villareal had a clear game plan as well. Considering the fact that their two strikers are performing well and are well-synchronized, the wingers were instructed to cross the ball often. The full-backs would advance, but not overlap frequently. This could either not be a part of the game plan or because of the attacking threat, Barcelona posed from the start. With Dani Parejo in midfield, Emery would ideally be able to continue playing the possession-based football his teams play. Coquelin would offer a bit of dynamism in midfield along with the Spanish midfielder.
However, Koeman took an interesting decision and gave Busquets the role to man-mark Parejo. Though both were surprisingly not the best on the ball on the day, Busquets did well to restrict Parejo to lateral and back passes. In the second-half, Vilalreal’s game plan was executed better in the 4-4-2 diamond. This allowed Parejo to get on the ball more, wit him playing a major role in the build-up. Emery knows his players’ strengths very well. Parejo in the defensive mid role, with pacey wingers on either sides means fast transitions. For Barcelona s well, the transitions were key. Coutinho’s mediapunta role and the freedom Messi has both contributed to this.
We already saw the many benefits this formation has offered, taking the strengths of the players Koeman has into full consideration. The ease during build-up with one pivot dropping back, being able to sustain the attack with the mediapunta getting more space, the freedom Busquets had to man-mark Parejo, which would have been difficult in a single pivot, etc. Another one of the advantages is in defense.
Barcelona were vulnerable in defense throughout last season. Jordi Alba looks like refreshed and fitter than usual, and with Dest potentially joining the Blaugrana, the full-backs are looking promising. In case that Barcelona does get caught on the counter, Koeman does have a solution to one of the problems. When Barcelona are on the backfoot, De Jong and Busquets would need to make sure their positioning is immaculate. They were instructed to plug the gaps between the center-halves and full-backs, which would have a two-fold purpose. Firstly, through-balls against more creative players would be much more difficult, with the gaps being reduced and Coutinho and Griezmann helping in defense. Secondly, the opposition would be less likely to crowd the box, since Barcelona can now afford to get at least 4 players into the box if the pivots were to position themselves as such. However, this would be very dependent on the split-second judgment and whether the players decide to press or track-back.
For Koeman’s first La Liga match, the performance was quite promising. Barcelona looked better tactically and in terms of hard work than Villareal as we saw in this tactical analysis. The latter being something that Barcelona desperately need, what remains to be seen is how Barcelona will fare against teams that rely on individual ability more than Villareal and the unpredictability that follows. Apart from this, will the players be able to sustain the intense work ethic Koeman demands? If Barcelona do decently in these conditions and some others, we might see a much better season from them than expected.